#Ssl duende cyber monday 2018 how to#

On the mixing side of things I don't think I've ever boosted with a bell past 8-10k. What about simply running sessions at higher sample rates? Wouldn't that achieve the same effect?

for example additional short compensation FIR filter for phase (like at DMG Equality and Equilibrium) or completely FIR based minimum phase EQs (DMG stuff, DDMF LP10), where you can basically make whatever phase and magnitude response you want. Oversampled ones - HOFA IQ-EQ, TDR EQs, Pro-Q in natural mode, StandardEQ by SIR, Massenburg MDW EQ. mode, TB Equalizer (partial, only bells), Sonnox EQ (bells, shelves, but cramped filters), AVID EQ3 in PT, Brainworx bx_digital, Sonimus EQs, DMG EQs in zero lat. just from top of my headД¬ramped - Waves Q10, SSL Duende, MH CS, Reaper ReaEQ.Дe-cramped magnitude - Waves RenEQ, Waves SSL, Eiosis AirEQ, Fab Pro-Q in zero lat. Those are most common ways how digital EQ designers solve that issue. There you have approximated magnitude curve so it doesn't warp towards highs, however this will solve just magnitude part, phase response is still warped towards Nyquist. on the other hand, it consumes some CPU cycles and adds another filtering to the path.ДЄnother option is to have modified filter design to have analog modeled magnitude response. It also helps to retain phase response corresponding to analog EQs.

#Ssl duende cyber monday 2018 how to#

Plugin oversampling is one option, how to deal with warping at lower rates. but for most cases, when you record and work with live audio, double rates are IMO optimal. (for instance, when converters doesn't sound so well at the rate or there's more intermodulation distortion due to wide bandwidth). likely dependent on what you're doing and whether you can afford that or if it's feasible and there are certainly situations, where double rate can even lead to worse outcome. That's my personal favorite way of dealing with that.

So while it might be maybe nice to have de-cramped filter for some plugins, I'm really not so fundamentalistic about that Of course, when you work at double sample rates, it practically doesn't matter, because warping happens towards 44-48kHz. Shelf is of course also affected by mentioned curve warping, but due to its gentle nature, it doesn't sound detrimental to me and when it's necessary, I use another more surgical EQ. in most cases I'm using its EQ as a first broad (lo-hi balance) effect with gainstaging and HPF, so its high band is 90% of time switched to shelf. severity of this problem depends on particular EQ and its usage, it's just one technical parameter for judging of the effect.ДЇor example I've used Duende many times, and it's still my favorite channel strip regardless of that. so it's cramped and shapes of its filters are distorted (warped).